11 Comments
User's avatar
Romain Faure's avatar

Super good play so far !!

Vince Martin's avatar

yeah. what's pretty wild is that we're up 9%, and so only to the point where a $4.4B acquisition has led to a $4.4B destruction in equity value (instead of ~$5B). Still think it's an excellent buy here, I'm long in size.

Romain Faure's avatar

Going strong in as well Monday

Amit Jain's avatar

given the valuations, this seems like what Lynch would classify as "hot stock in a hot industry".

Vince Martin's avatar

It definitely was in early November! Little tougher to call it a "hot stock" down 40%-plus, but I see your point - there's definitely some optimism toward broader tailwinds, even at the current valuation.

Romain Faure's avatar

So far so good in this play :)

MikeFromNZ's avatar

How would you play something like this? Buy a starter position now and scale in as GTLS executes?

Vince Martin's avatar

I see this as a pricing opportunity much more than a business opportunity (though I do think this is a good business), so from my perspective it's full position or zero. If the thesis is correct, there should be a relatively quick bounce, as the market gets a chance to incorporate exactly how insane this plunge has been. I'd want to capture that bounce in full.

That said, the way I see this scaling in isn't terrible, because I think the sell-off is ridiculously overdone. I'd love to be in here below $130 (Friday's close was $126) but I wouldn't hate an entry under $150. It's probably a lower-risk strategy to nibble and see how the market reacts, and then add on if/when the bounce becomes clear. (We'll see if Friday's +3% move meant anything.)

Personally, I'm planning to buy at the open on Monday and it will be something in the range of a full position. Not investing advice, of course, but that's my view for my portfolio.

MikeFromNZ's avatar

Thanks, it's really interesting to get more insight into your thought process.

Vince Martin's avatar

I've looked at it before, albeit not this closely. What spurred this article was just a simple screen for 1-month decliners. Per finviz, it's the 27th-worst performer out of 3,880 names (market cap $300M+).